Defined Contribution

Restructuring a Multi-Manager Plan: A Case Study

Restructuring a Multi-Manager Plan: Lessons from a Case Study
clock
1 min 52 sec

By Ben Taylor and Michael Joecken

In the most recent edition of the DC Observer, we described the restructuring of a city-sponsored 457(b) plan with nearly $1 billion in assets that uses multi-manager funds. The revamping process examined the investment fund structure, participant enrollment, and investment management fees.

In our article we detailed the steps the plan, working with advice from Callan, took to meet its goals for the restructuring, including:

  • Replacing its custodian
  • Adopting Callan’s recommendation for a three-tier fund lineup
    • Tier I offers choices for participants who want a “do it for me” option
    • Tier II is for participants who want more control within certain guidelines
    • Tier III is for “do it myself” investors
  • Shifting to target date funds from target risk funds
  • Simplifying the structure of, and reducing the number of managers for, its equity and fixed income white label fund options
  • Conducting a re-enrollment to re-engage participants

As a result of these steps:

  • The savings rate went from 4.7% to 5.7%.
  • The participation rate initially improved from 63% to 83%; one year later it stood at 91%. The biggest improvements were seen among women, minorities, and low-wage employees.
  • Asset allocation improved dramatically, with do-it-for-me fund assets jumping to 24% of plan assets.
  • Due to outreach efforts, a majority of participants made active elections during the re-enrollment process, even if the active election was to choose to remain in the default TDF after having that option explained to them.
  • Fees for the active equity fund declined to 41 bps.
  • Fees for the active fixed income fund declined to 35 bps.
  • Fees for all index funds declined due to a move to collective investment trusts.
  • Recordkeeping costs were reduced.

Our work with this plan and others has led us to identify the following principles to help plan sponsors achieve the best outcomes when they re-evaluate their plans:

  1. Start the process with clear goals in mind
  2. Be prepared to reevaluate all aspects of the plan from the recordkeeper to fund selection to participant communication
  3. Identify the committee or individuals who will participate in the process and ensure they have the necessary time
  4. Understand the process may be lengthy, and have a realistic timeline
  5. Be prepared to make critical, interwoven decisions as the process unfolds
  6. Strongly consider making all changes at once rather than handling the changes in stages
  7. Measure outcomes

For full details of the restructuring, please find our paper here.

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Operations

Financial Wellness: Is It the Right Prescription for Your DC Plan?

Jana Steele
Jana Steele provides a summary of her recent white paper on financial wellness options for DC plans.
Operations

DOL Proposes Tightened Proxy Voting Guidelines

Patrick Wisdom
The department’s new proposal dovetails with SEC guidance finalized in 2020 and would create a refined set of circumstances in which plan fiduciarie...
Operations

Fine-Tuning Implementation of the CARES Act

Jana Steele
The IRS has issued two notices and a FAQ to clarify how defined contribution (DC) plan sponsors should implement the provisions of the act, touching o...
ESG

DOL Calls for Stricter Rules Around ESG Investing in Retirement Plans

Thomas Shingler
Operations

Our DC Index Had a Noteworthy First Quarter

Patrick Wisdom
Operations

DOL Issues Common-Sense Information Letter About Private Equity in DC Plans

DC Consulting Group
Operations

Callan Survey: DC Plan Response to CARES Act Varied by Industry and Recordkeeper

Jana Steele
Operations

Freezing or Suspending Matching Contributions: Requirements and Timing

Jana Steele
Operations

Guidance on Substantial Workforce Cuts and DC Plan Terminations

Jana Steele
Operations

A Checklist for Assessing Stable Value Funds

Kyle Fekete

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.