Defined Benefit
Insurance Assets
Nonprofit

Our First Private Credit Fees and Terms Study: What We Found in 2023

Our First Private Credit Fees and Terms Study: What We Found in 2023
clock
3 min 5 sec

Callan’s 2023 Private Credit Fees and Terms Study is our inaugural study in the private credit space. The study is intended to help institutional investors better evaluate private credit funds, serving as an industry benchmark when comparing a partnership’s terms to its peers. This study can also be useful for general partners (GPs), to determine how their fees and terms compare to other managers.

This study includes 330 private credit partnerships, representing fund offerings reviewed by Callan that were in the market in 2016-YTD 2022 (as of 3Q). The data was collected through manager outreach and provided by the GPs. We focused on the following principal terms to provide a concise snapshot of the market:

  • Management fees
  • Type of “waterfall”
  • Carried interest percentage
  • Preferred return

Private credit terms have shifted since the emergence of the asset class after the Global Financial Crisis. Management fees and carry have evolved from 2% and 20% to a median of 1.5% and 15%. We have also seen increases in tiered pricing depending on fund leverage and commitment amounts. First-close discounts also became increasingly popular. Limited partner (LP) pressure to increase preferred returns back to 8% is expected to continue in the rising interest rate environment.

Highlights of the Private Credit Fees Study
  • By strategy, the dataset is weighted toward direct lending, which represents 62% of the partnerships reviewed. Opportunistic credit comprises the second largest component. Post-COVID, there has been a pickup in opportunistic credit and multi-strategy fund allocations.
  • The study is tilted toward North American and global strategies, which represented 86% of the dataset.
  • The median GP commitment has hovered around 1%, with 60% of managers committing between 1% and 1.49%. A strong GP commitment is important to ensure adequate alignment between the general partner and its limited partners.
  • The median management fee during the investment period (typically the first two to three years of a fund’s life) was 1.15%. During the investment period, management fees are almost always paid as a percentage of invested capital.
private credit fees
  • Management fees during the investment period varied somewhat depending on the strategy type. Direct lending tended to have lower fees, partially because those fees are paid on a larger capital base. Opportunistic, distressed, multi-strategy, and asset-based lending tended to have the highest median management fees. Real assets and niche strategies had lower median management fees of 1.00%, partially due to the evolution of these asset classes and the fact that many niche strategies are smaller and newer and thus price their strategies below market to attract new capital.
  • Direct lending and niche managers charged the lowest management fees during the post-investment period, with a median of 1.00% over the study period. Fee dispersion, however, has been wider than for some other strategy types. Opportunistic, distressed, multi-strategy, and asset-based lending strategies charged the highest management fees during the post-investment period.
  • The majority of the dataset had a European waterfall (fund-as-a-whole, more LP-friendly), and this remained relatively consistent over the last seven years. The remainder, just under a quarter, had either an American (deal-by-deal, more GP-friendly), hybrid, or other waterfall.
  • The most common carried interest percentage was 15%, with 36% of funds at this level.
  • Median preferred returns were in the 6%-7% range, down from 8% earlier in the life cycle of private credit. The vast majority of partnerships used a compounded calculation for the preferred return. Many managers indicated that the impetus for bringing down the preferred return from 8% to 6%-7% has been due to the low interest rate environment. In the recent rising interest rate environment, LPs have been asking that managers raise preferred returns accordingly.

Callan plans to update this study on a regular basis; each time, our dataset will broaden and become increasingly representative of the private credit industry.

Disclosures

The Callan Institute (the “Institute”) is, and will be, the sole owner and copyright holder of all material prepared or developed by the Institute. No party has the right to reproduce, revise, resell, disseminate externally, disseminate to any affiliate firms, or post on internal websites any part of any material prepared or developed by the Institute, without the Institute’s permission. Institute clients only have the right to utilize such material internally in their business.

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Private Markets

2024 Private Equity Fees and Terms Study: Lessons for Institutional Investors

Ashley Kahn
This study analyzes private equity fees and terms to help institutional investors.
Private Markets

Nonprofits: Same Mission, but New Approach to Allocations

Tony Lissuzzo
Callan expert discusses changes in nonprofit allocation trends over the last 20 years.
Private Markets

Gains Outpace Leveraged Loans Over Time; Spreads Contract

Constantine Braswell
Callan experts analyzes private credit activity in 2Q24.
Private Markets

Private Credit Gained in 4Q23 but Lagged High Yield Benchmark

Constantine Braswell
Callan expert analyzes private credit activity in 1Q24.
Private Markets

Private Credit Performance Tops Leveraged Loan Index Over Long Time Periods

Alternatives Consulting Group
An update on private credit performance in 4Q23
Operations

Exclusive 2023 Study Analyzes Investment Management Fees for Institutional Investors

Ivan "Butch" Cliff
Butch Cliff summarizes his comprehensive look at investment management fees paid by institutional investors in 2022.
Private Markets

Private Credit Returns Exceed Those of Leveraged Loans

Roxanne Quinn
Our analysis of 3Q23 private credit activity.
Private Markets

Private Credit IRRs Stay Steady and Range from 8%-10%

Alternatives Consulting Group
Our analysis of private credit activity in 2Q23.
Private Markets

Private Credit Interest Focuses on Relative Value and Downside Protection

Alternatives Consulting Group
Our assessment of private credit performance and fundraising for 1Q23.
Private Markets

Investor Appetite for Private Credit Continues, but Strategies of Interest Shift

Alternatives Consulting Group
Our assessment of private credit performance in 4Q22 and for 2022 as investor appetite for the asset class continues.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.