Defined Benefit
Insurance Assets
Nonprofit

2024 Private Equity Fees and Terms Study: Lessons for Institutional Investors

2024 Private Equity Fees and Terms Study: Lessons for Institutional Investors
clock
3 min 55 sec

In an update to our two previous editions, Callan conducted our 2024 Private Equity Fees and Terms Study by analyzing 413 private equity partnerships, representing fund offerings in the market from 2018-24 (including funds currently fundraising). This study is intended to help institutional investors better evaluate private equity funds, serving as an industry benchmark when comparing a partnership’s terms to its peers. It can also be useful for general partners, to determine how their fees and terms compare to other managers.

With each year, the study’s dataset broadens, and this year we include a wide variety of general partners (GPs) and strategy types. We have also expanded this year’s study to include fund-of-funds and secondaries funds. This year’s study leverages CallanDNA as the data source, which is Callan’s proprietary database application. It includes the partnerships that were evaluated in Callan’s prior studies and adds more recent partnerships. The data was pulled from the funds’ limited partnership agreements or private placement memoranda, in addition to direct submissions by investment managers into CallanDNA.

We focused on the following principal terms to provide a concise snapshot of the market:

  • Minimum limited partner (LP) commitment
  • General partner commitment
  • Management fees
  • Type of “waterfall”
  • Carried interest percentage
  • Preferred return and general partner (GP) catch-up

Unlike trends observed in other asset classes (namely the public markets), private equity fees have not come down over time. Most private equity managers are not inclined to change their fees from one fund to the next, leading to relative stability in fees, at least over shorter timeframes. Fees today are not that much different than fees seven years ago. Any variability from year to year is dependent on the strategy composition of the dataset. Fees can vary widely by strategy type, with two key observable trends: (1) higher risk/return strategies (namely venture capital) typically charge higher fees; and (2) smaller funds also tend to charge higher fees. As a result, the more venture capital and small buyout funds in the dataset, the higher the aggregate fee calculations.

private equity fees

Fund-of-funds and secondaries funds represented 16% of the dataset. Of the direct partnerships included in the study, they were weighted toward buyout funds, which represented 52% of the partnerships (61% of direct partnerships). Venture capital and growth equity represented an aggregate 31% of the dataset (36% of the direct partnerships). Distressed/restructuring funds consistently represent a small portion of the dataset at just 2%.

Highlights from Our 2024 Private Equity Fees and Terms Study
  • Minimum LP Commitment: $10 million remained the most common, at 37% of the dataset. The average was $8.8 million.
  • Average GP Commitment: The level of 3.6% represented a drop from 4.2% in our last study, reflecting the inclusion of more venture capital funds in this year’s study, which tend to have lower GP commitments.
  • Management Fees: During the investment period, the median was 1.75%-2.00%, consistent with prior studies. Fees after the investment period dropped by 20-25 bps. This fee also varies widely by strategy type.
private equity fees
  • Fee Offset: Every fund in the dataset offset management fees by any transaction, monitoring, or other fees paid to the general partner, and the vast majority had a 100% offset.
  • Waterfalls: American waterfalls (deal-by-deal) were far more prevalent than European waterfalls (fund-as-a-whole), which are more friendly for limited partners.
  • Carried Interest: The vast majority of funds charged 20%.
  • Preferred Return: Of the dataset, 84% had a preferred return of 8%, and most used a compounded calculation for the return.
Two New Additions to the Study

In broadening our dataset, the addition of fund-of-funds and secondaries funds serves as a helpful benchmark for these types of strategies. These funds have especially complex fee structures with varying levels of carried interest and tiered management fee structures.

  • Fund-of-Funds: These represented 29 partnerships in the study. Given they charge two layers of fees, fund-of-funds management fees tend to be lower than direct partnerships, with an average of 0.76% during the investment period and 0.70% post. The carried interest structure of fund-of-funds also differs from direct funds, as fund-of-funds charge different carried interest percentages on different sleeves of the program (primaries, secondaries, and co-investments). The primaries sleeve of a fund-of-funds typically charges the lowest carry (often 0% or 5%), while the secondaries and co-investments sleeves will charge 5% or 10%.
2024 PE Study FOF Charts
  • Secondaries: These represented 27 partnerships. Secondaries funds typically charge higher fees than diversified fund-of-funds, with management fees averaging 1.07% during the investment period and 1.04% post. Carried interest is also typically higher, with most secondaries funds charging 10%-15% carried interest.

Each year this study is conducted, the growing size of the dataset becomes more representative of the broader private equity industry. With data now stretching back seven vintage years, we have a greater ability to see trends in fees over time.

Disclosures

The Callan Institute (the “Institute”) is, and will be, the sole owner and copyright holder of all material prepared or developed by the Institute. No party has the right to reproduce, revise, resell, disseminate externally, disseminate to any affiliate firms, or post on internal websites any part of any material prepared or developed by the Institute, without the Institute’s permission. Institute clients only have the right to utilize such material internally in their business.

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Private Markets

Nonprofits: Same Mission, but New Approach to Allocations

Tony Lissuzzo
Callan expert discusses changes in nonprofit allocation trends over the last 20 years.
Private Markets

Some Early Signs of a Rebound, but Challenges Remain

Ashley Kahn
Callan expert analyzes private equity activity in 2Q24, from fundraising to exits.
Operations

A Deeper Look at How We Did With Our Capital Markets Assumptions

Julia Moriarty
An analysis of how Callan's Capital Markets Assumptions performed over time by asset class.
Private Markets

Significant Drops in Private Equity Activity From Peak Years of 2021-22

Ashley Kahn
Callan expert analyzes private equity activity in 1Q24, from fundraising to exits.
Private Markets

Sector-Specialist Strategies: What Institutional Investors Need to Know

Chrissy Mehnert
A look at sector-specialist strategies and how institutional investors can analyze them.
Private Markets

Private Equity Sees a Big Slowdown After Frenzy of 2021

Ashley Kahn
An update on private equity performance in 4Q23 and for the year.
Operations

Exclusive 2023 Study Analyzes Investment Management Fees for Institutional Investors

Ivan "Butch" Cliff
Butch Cliff summarizes his comprehensive look at investment management fees paid by institutional investors in 2022.
Private Markets

Private Equity Investors Focus on Exits as Activity Drops

Alternatives Consulting Group
The Alternatives Consulting Group provides an update on private equity performance in 3Q23.
Operations

What Investors Need to Know About the SEC’s 2023 Private Funds Rules

Alternatives Consulting Group
The Alternatives Consulting Group analyzes the new SEC rules on unregistered private funds.
Private Markets

Private Equity Headwinds Slow Liquidity

Alternatives Consulting Group
Gary Robertson provides an update on private equity activity in 2Q23, from fundraising to exits.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.